Quality Concepts and Management Systems Awareness
An effort to create awareness. ..... Sharing knowledge for a better tomorrow. Editor - Keshav Ram Singhal
Welcome
Sunday, November 8, 2026
Increasing the Power of Your QMS – Achieve Performance Excellence through Continual Improvement
Thursday, November 5, 2026
A Proud Moment – QMS Awareness Blog Recognised Among the Top 18 Quality Management Blogs (2026 Edition)
A Proud Moment – QMS Awareness Blog Recognised Among the Top 18 Quality Management Blogs (2026 Edition)
**********
'
I am pleased to share that my this blog has been selected by the panelists of Feedspot as one of the Top 18 Quality Management Blogs on the Web (2026 Edition). This recognition is encouraging and gives me further motivation to continue my efforts towards promoting awareness and understanding of Quality Management Systems (QMS), particularly ISO 9001.
I started my blogging journey on ISO 9001 awareness in 2008 with the objective of sharing knowledge, simplifying quality management concepts and making information accessible to students, professionals, consultants, auditors and organizations. Over the years, the journey has continued through articles, discussions and knowledge-sharing initiatives covering various aspects of Quality Management and related management system standards.
I sincerely thank the Feedspot panelists for this recognition and all readers, visitors and well-wishers who have encouraged and supported my efforts. I firmly believe that knowledge grows when it is shared, and quality improves when awareness is strengthened. This recognition inspires me to continue contributing to the Quality Management community.
Recognition: Top 18 Quality Management Blogs on the Web – 2026 Edition – CLICK HERE
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal
Quality Week / Month 2026: 'Quality: Powering Performance' – Driving New Performance with Quality
Quality Week / Month 2026: 'Quality: Powering Performance' – Driving New Performance with Quality
- Quality Council of India (QCI) and NBQP: The Quality Council and the National Board for Quality Promotion (NBQP) conduct regional quality conferences, capacity-building workshops, and awareness campaigns across the country. Indian manufacturing and service sectors are being made globally competitive through initiatives such as the 'Zero Defect Zero Effect' (ZED Certification Scheme), especially in the MSME sector.
- Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS): BIS is strengthening the foundation of quality across the country through standardization, product certification, and consumer protection. While BIS's major national celebration is World Standards Day in October, its regional offices conduct technical seminars and awareness programs throughout the year.
- National Centre for Quality Management (NCQM): NCQM 0rganizes various programs from time to time.
- Quality Circle Forum of India (QCFI): QCFI is organizing a webinar on November 12, 2026 (World Quality Day).
- Knowledge sharing: Share insights on modern management standards (such as the latest provisions of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001, etc.) through our blog, articles, and social media platforms.
- Organizing sessions within the organization: Organize small workshops or webinars on continuous improvement and process efficiency for our team or colleagues.
- Emphasis on sustainability: Promote green practices in the workplace by recognizing the interplay between the environment and quality.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026
Historical Background: Origin of Quality in India – 03 – Evolution of Quality Institutions in India
Historical Background: Origin of Quality in India – 03 – Evolution of Quality Institutions in India
**********
In the previous two articles, we explored the historical background of quality in India, from ancient Indian traditions and practices to the development of modern quality management. We also discussed the establishment of the Indian Standards Institution (ISI), subsequently replaced by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), and the contributions of organizations such as the National Centre for Quality Management (NCQM) and Quality Circle Forum of India (QCFI).
Over the years, several national institutions have contributed to strengthening India's quality infrastructure through standardization, accreditation, testing, calibration, certification, measurement science and quality promotion.
Let us briefly understand the background and contributions of some important institutions.
1. Quality Council of India (QCI)
The Quality Council of India (QCI) is an important milestone in the development of quality institutions in India. During the 1990s, the need was felt to establish a national accreditation structure that would be internationally recognized and promote confidence in conformity assessment activities.
The Union Cabinet took a decision in 1996 to establish QCI. Accordingly, it was set up in 1997 as an autonomous, non-profit organization through a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, with the support of the Government of India and three major industry associations Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM), Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI).
Accordingly QCI was established to create an accreditation structure in India and promote the quality movement through independent third-party assessment of products, services and processes. QCI functions through five constituent boards, each having its own area of responsibility.
2. Five Constituent Boards of QCI
(a) National Board for Quality Promotion (NBQP)
NBQP promotes quality consciousness and encourages the adoption of quality management practices across different sectors. Its activities include awareness programmes, workshops, training, conferences and promotion of quality tools and techniques, productivity improvement and continuous improvement.
(b) National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL)
The laboratory accreditation programme in India was initiated by the Department of Science and Technology during the Sixth Five-Year Plan period (1980–85). It was initially known as the National Coordination of Testing and Calibration Facilities (NCTCF). In 1993, it was renamed NABL. It was registered as a society in 1998 and subsequently became a constituent board of QCI in 2017.
NABL provides accreditation to testing, calibration and medical laboratories, among other conformity assessment facilities. Its accreditation helps establish confidence in the technical competence of laboratories and the reliability of their results.
(c) National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH)
Established in 2005 as a constituent board of QCI, NABH promotes quality and patient safety in healthcare organizations. It provides accreditation and certification programmes for hospitals and other healthcare providers, encouraging systematic processes, better patient care and continuous improvement in healthcare services.
(d) National Accreditation Board for Certification Bodies (NABCB)
NABCB provides accreditation to certification bodies, inspection bodies and validation and verification bodies. Its activities cover areas such as Quality Management Systems (ISO 9001), Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001), Food Safety Management Systems (ISO 22000), product certification and inspection. It helps establish confidence in the competence of conformity assessment bodies.
(e) National Accreditation Board for Education and Training (NABET)
NABET works towards improving the quality of education, training and skill development. Its activities include assessment and accreditation of educational institutions and training organizations, as well as assessment activities in areas such as environmental impact assessment consultancy.
Together, these five boards support quality promotion and accreditation across several sectors of the Indian economy.
3. Standardisation Testing and Quality Certification (STQC) Directorate
The Standardisation Testing and Quality Certification (STQC) programme came into existence in 1977 under the then Department of Electronics, Government of India. It was established to assist the Indian electronics industry in improving the quality of its products and services. STQC functions under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). It provides testing, calibration, inspection, certification and training services in electronics, information technology and related areas.
An important milestone was achieved in 1991 when STQC Certification Services became the first third-party certification agency of Indian origin in India to offer Quality Management System (QMS) certification. Its activities include ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 27001 certification, product safety certification, website quality certification and testing and certification of smart cards and biometric devices. Indian Institute of Quality Management (IIQM) operates under STQC Directorate.
4. CSIR-National Physical Laboratory (NPL-India)
The National Physical Laboratory (NPL), India, is one of the earliest national laboratories established under the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). The foundation stone of NPL was laid by the then Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, on 4 January 1947. Its main building was formally inaugurated by the then Deputy Prime Minister, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, on 21 January 1950. NPL is India's National Metrology Institute (NMI). Its primary responsibility is to establish, maintain and improve national measurement standards. It supports measurement accuracy and traceability through research, calibration services and reference materials.
5. Other Institutions Contributing to Quality
Several other national institutions contribute to quality assurance, productivity improvement and consumer protection in specific sectors.
- National Productivity Council (NPC): Promotes productivity and organizational competitiveness through consultancy, training, research and advisory services, including activities relating to quality management and operational excellence.
- Export Inspection Council (EIC): Established under the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963, it provides an institutional framework for quality control and inspection of export products.
- Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI): Established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, it lays down science-based food standards and regulates food safety in India.
These institutions illustrate the importance of quality across manufacturing, healthcare, education, food safety, exports and services.
Conclusion
The institutional development of quality in India reflects the growing recognition of quality as an essential element of economic development, industrial competitiveness, consumer protection and societal well-being. From the establishment of the Indian Standards Institution in 1947 to the development of institutions such as BIS, NCQM, QCFI, NABL, NABH, NABCB, NABET, NBQP, STQC, IIQM, NPL, NPC, EIC, FSSAI, India has progressively strengthened its quality infrastructure. The journey towards quality excellence in India is continuous, and every organization and individual has a role to play.
Readers may also like to read the previously published articles in this series:
1. Historical Background: Origin of Quality in India – 01 – Click Here
2. Historical Background: Origin of Quality in India – 02 – Click Here
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal
Monday, November 2, 2026
The Experiential Learning Cycle
Saturday, October 31, 2026
Internal Audit and Management Review
Internal Audit and Management Review
**********
In many organizations, internal audits or management reviews are conducted only shortly before the certification auditors arrive, so that the organization can avoid a nonconformity for not having performed an internal audit or management review. This is a common but incorrect practice.
Many organizations treat internal audits and management reviews merely as a formality to be completed just before the certification auditors arrive, in order to avoid a nonconformity. While this may satisfy the minimum requirement of the standard, it defeats the real purpose of the management system.
What does the standard say?
ISO 9001 (and other management system standards such as ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 27001, and ISO 30201) require internal audits (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3) to be conducted at “planned intervals.” No fixed frequency is prescribed in the standard; however:
- The audit programme must be established taking into consideration the importance of the processes, the results of previous audits, and changes.
- The entire system must be covered within one cycle (normally one year).
- The management review must consider the required inputs (such as audit results, customer satisfaction, process performance, risks and opportunities, etc.) and shall result in concrete decisions and actions.
Conducting the internal audit and management review only a few weeks before the external audit does not fulfil the spirit of “planned intervals” or the expectation of an effective system.
Disadvantages of this approach
- Loss of opportunity for continual improvement: Problems remain undetected throughout the year and surface only during the external audit.
- Insufficient time: There is not enough time to close findings, carry out root cause analysis, and verify the effectiveness of actions.
- Superficial audits: Audits and reviews conducted in haste are often formal in nature and add little real value.
- Perception of the certification body: Experienced auditors can easily recognize that all activities were performed only just before their visit. This raises questions about the maturity of the system.
Better approach
It is in the organization’s interest to:
1. Establish a year-round audit programme. Audit important or high-risk processes more frequently.
2. Conduct management reviews on a quarterly or half-yearly basis (or at least annually, with effective monitoring in between). Do not turn it into a mere data dump — ensure decisions are taken and resources are allocated.
3. Complete the final internal audit 6–8 weeks before the external audit, so that any nonconformities identified can be closed in time.
4. Treat the internal audit not as a “tool for finding nonconformities,” but as a “tool for improvement and verification of effectiveness.”
Conclusion
Internal audits and management reviews are not meant for certification; they exist for the continual improvement and risk management of the organization. Only when they are conducted regularly and sincerely does the organization derive real benefits — better processes, fewer problems, and a stronger system.
Organizations should avoid the situation described above and should continue to conduct internal audits and management reviews at regular intervals. This is in the organization’s own interest.
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal
Friday, October 30, 2026
Quality Culture and Ethical Behaviour: Requirements in ISO 9001:2026 QMS
Quality Culture and Ethical Behaviour: Requirements in ISO 9001:2026 QMS
**********
While reading the newly published standard ISO 9001:2026, I observed that the phrase “quality culture and ethical behaviour” is used several times. Let us examine its significance and implications for the requirements of a Quality Management System (QMS).
1. References in ISO 9001:2026
Foreword
The Foreword identifies the introduction of quality culture and ethical behaviour as one of the main changes in the revised standard. It explains that these aspects are now addressed within the requirements, particularly in relation to leadership, awareness and the environment for the operation of processes.
Clause 5.1.1 — Leadership and commitment
Subclause 5.1.1 (i) requires top management to demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the QMS by promoting quality culture and ethical behaviour.
Note 2 at the end of this clause clarifies that an organization's quality culture and ethical behaviour are reflected in its shared values, attitudes, practices and actions.
Clause 7.1.4 — Environment for the operation of processes
This clause requires the organization to determine, provide and maintain the environment necessary for the operation of its processes and to achieve conformity of products and services.
The accompanying note explains that a suitable environment may involve a combination of human and physical factors. It further clarifies that some of these factors can be influenced by the organization's quality culture and ethical behaviour.
Clause 7.3 — Awareness
Subclause 7.3 (e) requires the organization to ensure that persons doing work under its control are aware of the organization's quality culture and ethical behaviour.
Annex A — Guidance on the requirements
The phrase “quality culture and ethical behaviour” also appears several times in Annex A. However, Annex A is informative and provides guidance for understanding the requirements; it does not introduce additional requirements for the QMS.
2. Implications from an auditing perspective
If we examine these provisions from an audit perspective, two explicit requirements deserve particular attention:
1. Leadership: Has top management demonstrated its commitment to promoting quality culture and ethical behaviour within the organization?
2. Awareness: Are persons doing work under the organization's control aware of its quality culture and ethical behaviour?
Auditors may seek objective evidence to establish whether these requirements have been addressed effectively. Such evidence could include management decisions, communication, awareness activities, workplace practices and the behaviour demonstrated by organizational leaders and personnel.
The auditor should not merely verify whether a policy or statement exists. The focus should be on how the organization promotes quality culture and ethical behaviour and whether relevant personnel are aware of them.
Furthermore, Clause 7.1.4 provides an additional connection between organizational culture, ethical behaviour and the environment in which processes operate. Therefore, the audit should not be restricted to leadership and awareness alone.
3. Is there a gap in Clause 9 — Performance evaluation?
One aspect that deserves consideration is the absence of an explicit requirement in Clause 9 to monitor, measure or evaluate the effectiveness of quality culture and ethical behaviour.
Clause 9 addresses performance evaluation through monitoring, measurement, analysis, evaluation, internal audits and management reviews. However, it does not specifically require organizations to evaluate the effectiveness of their efforts to promote quality culture and ethical behaviour.
This raises an important question: How can an organization determine whether its efforts to promote quality culture and ethical behaviour are effective if the standard does not explicitly require their effectiveness to be evaluated?
For example, an organization may conduct awareness programmes and communicate its expectations regarding ethical behaviour. However, the completion of these activities alone does not necessarily demonstrate that the intended culture has been established or that ethical behaviour is consistently practised.
A more explicit requirement to evaluate the effectiveness of quality culture and ethical behaviour could have strengthened the standard by encouraging an organization to assess whether its initiatives are achieving the intended results.
4. Conclusion
ISO 9001:2026 gives greater prominence to quality culture and ethical behaviour by explicitly addressing them in the requirements relating to leadership, awareness and the environment for the operation of processes. Nevertheless, the absence of an explicit requirement in Clause 9 to evaluate their effectiveness may be considered a limitation.
In my view, promoting quality culture and ethical behaviour is important, but evaluating whether these efforts are effective is equally significant. Such evaluation could help organizations identify gaps, take appropriate action and strengthen their QMS.
What is your opinion? Should ISO 9001 explicitly require organizations to evaluate the effectiveness of their quality culture and ethical behaviour as part of performance evaluation?
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal
Sunday, October 25, 2026
Importance of Leadership in Effective QMS Implementation
Importance of Leadership in Effective QMS Implementation
**********
According to a popular saying, if an army of dogs is led by a lion, the dogs can fight like lions and achieve victory. Conversely, if an army of lions is led by a dog, even the lions may fight like dogs and face defeat. The underlying message is that the quality of leadership significantly influences the performance, motivation, and success of a team. Clause 5.1.1 of ISO 9001:2026 standard identifies 12 specific ways in which top management is required to demonstrate leadership and commitment, from establishing the quality policy and integrating QMS requirements into business processes to promoting quality culture, ethical behaviour, the process approach, and risk-based and opportunity-based thinking.
Importance of Leadership in the Context of ISO 9001:2026 QMS
Leadership plays a vital role in the effective implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS). The commitment of top management determines how seriously quality is taken throughout an organization and how effectively quality management principles are integrated into its activities.
The success of a QMS cannot be ensured merely by preparing documented information, establishing procedures, and conducting audits. It requires active leadership, employee involvement, adequate resources, and a commitment to meeting customer requirements and continually improving performance.
Clause 5.1.1 of ISO 9001:2026 specifies how top management shall demonstrate leadership and commitment to the QMS. These requirements can be understood through the following explanations and practical examples.
1. Establishing Quality Policy and Quality Objectives
Top management must ensure that the quality policy and quality objectives are established and are compatible with the organization's strategic direction.
Example: A manufacturing organization plans to expand its business by supplying products to international customers. Its top management establishes a quality policy emphasizing customer satisfaction, product conformity, and continual improvement. It also sets measurable quality objectives, such as reducing product rejection from 4% to 2% within one year.
This connects the organization's business strategy with its quality management objectives.
2. Integrating QMS Requirements into Business Processes
QMS requirements should be integrated into the organization's regular business processes rather than treated as separate activities undertaken merely to obtain or maintain certification.
Example: A company introduces quality checks at appropriate stages of production, incorporates supplier evaluation into purchasing activities, and includes customer feedback in product development and service improvement.
In this way, quality management becomes an integral part of everyday business operations.
3. Ensuring the Availability of Necessary Resources
Top management must ensure that the resources required for the effective operation of the QMS are available. These resources may include competent personnel, appropriate equipment, suitable infrastructure, adequate technology, and financial resources.
Example: If product defects are caused by outdated testing equipment, management arranges for suitable equipment and ensures that personnel are competent to use it. This enables the organization to verify product conformity more reliably.
4. Communicating the Importance of Effective Quality Management
Employees need to understand the importance of effective quality management and the consequences of failing to meet QMS requirements.
Example: During an employee meeting, management explains how incorrect measurements can result in defective products, customer complaints, rework, and financial losses. Employees are encouraged to follow established procedures and report quality problems without delay.
Such communication helps employees understand that quality is not merely the responsibility of the quality control department; it is a responsibility shared throughout the organization.
5. Ensuring That the QMS Achieves Its Intended Results
Top management must ensure that the QMS achieves its intended results, including the consistent provision of conforming products and services and the enhancement of customer satisfaction.
Example: Management periodically reviews data on customer complaints, product rejection, delivery performance, and process efficiency. If the results do not meet established objectives, appropriate corrective actions are initiated.
The emphasis is on achieving results rather than merely completing documentation and audit activities.
6. Directing and Supporting People
Effective leadership involves directing and supporting employees so that they can contribute to the effectiveness of the QMS.
Example: When production employees identify a recurring defect, management encourages them to investigate its cause, provides access to technical expertise, and supports trials of possible solutions.
Instead of blaming employees for reporting problems, management encourages their participation in resolving them.
7. Promoting Continual Improvement
Top management must promote continual improvement in the organization's processes, products, services, and QMS.
Example: An organization discovers that its order-processing procedure causes unnecessary delays. Management supports a review of the process, simplifies approval steps, and monitors the results to determine whether order-processing time has decreased.
Continual improvement should be an ongoing activity rather than an exercise undertaken only before an external audit.
8. Supporting Leadership at Other Organizational Levels
Top management should support other relevant roles within the organization in demonstrating leadership within their respective areas of responsibility.
Example: The production manager is encouraged to take responsibility for reducing production defects, while the purchasing manager focuses on supplier performance and the customer service manager works to resolve customer complaints effectively. Top management provides the necessary authority and resources while ensuring that these managers remain accountable for their responsibilities.
This approach develops leadership throughout the organization instead of concentrating all responsibility at the top.
9. Promoting Quality Culture and Ethical Behaviour
An effective quality culture develops when shared values, attitudes, practices, and actions demonstrate a commitment to quality. Ethical behaviour reinforces this culture by encouraging honesty, fairness, and responsible decision-making.
Example: During a quality inspection, an employee discovers that a product does not meet the specified requirements. The employee reports the nonconformity, even though doing so may delay dispatch. Management supports the employee's decision, ensures that the problem is addressed, and discourages the concealment or falsification of quality records. This demonstrates that customer trust and product conformity take precedence over the short-term pressure to meet production targets.
10. Promoting the Process Approach
The process approach involves understanding and managing interrelated processes as a coherent system to achieve intended results effectively.
Example: In a manufacturing organization, customer orders pass through several interconnected processes: order review, purchasing, production planning, manufacturing, inspection, packaging, and dispatch.
If the purchasing process supplies unsuitable raw materials, the manufacturing and inspection processes may be adversely affected. Management therefore ensures that the interfaces between these processes are properly managed and that their performance is monitored. The process approach is a cornerstone of an effective QMS because the performance of one process can influence the performance of other interrelated processes.**
11. Promoting Risk-Based and Opportunity-Based Thinking
Top management must promote the consideration of risks and opportunities when planning and operating processes.
Risk-based thinking helps an organization identify circumstances that could adversely affect its intended results. Opportunity-based thinking encourages it to identify possibilities for improving performance and achieving better results.
Example: A manufacturer identifies the risk that dependence on a single supplier could interrupt production. Management evaluates alternative suppliers and develops suitable contingency arrangements. At the same time, the organization identifies an opportunity to automate a repetitive inspection activity. After evaluating its feasibility, management introduces automation to improve inspection consistency and efficiency.
This approach helps the organization prepare for potential problems while taking advantage of opportunities for improvement.
12. Taking Accountability for QMS Effectiveness
Top management must take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. This means accepting responsibility for its performance and ensuring that it achieves its intended results.
Example: If the organization repeatedly fails to meet its quality objectives, top management reviews the reasons, evaluates whether adequate resources and controls are in place, and ensures that appropriate actions are taken.
Management cannot treat QMS effectiveness as the sole responsibility of the quality manager or the internal audit team. Although responsibilities may be assigned to different individuals, accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS remains with top management.
Customer Focus: An Essential Leadership Responsibility
Clause 5.1.2 of ISO 9001:2026 separately addresses leadership and commitment with respect to customer focus.
Top management must ensure that applicable customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements are determined, understood, and consistently met. It must also ensure that relevant risks and opportunities affecting product and service conformity and customer satisfaction are addressed, and that the focus on enhancing customer satisfaction is maintained.
Example: A service organization receives repeated complaints about delays in resolving customer requests. Top management reviews complaint data, identifies weaknesses in the service process, establishes a target for response times, and monitors performance. The organization subsequently evaluates customer feedback to determine whether the changes have improved customer satisfaction.
This example illustrates that customer focus requires more than responding to complaints; it requires systematic action to understand and meet customer needs.
Conclusion
Leadership is a fundamental factor in the successful implementation and maintenance of a QMS. Clause 5.1 of ISO 9001:2026 provides a framework for top management to demonstrate leadership and commitment through its decisions, actions, and support. An effective leader establishes a clear direction, provides necessary resources, integrates quality requirements into business processes, encourages employee participation, promotes ethical behaviour, and takes accountability for QMS effectiveness. A good leader does not merely issue instructions but inspires others by setting an example.
The popular saying about the lion and the dogs conveys an important message: leadership can influence how a team performs. However, in an organization, sustainable success also depends on employees' competence, appropriate resources, effective processes, teamwork, and a shared commitment to quality.
Remember: A culture of quality is developed not merely through instructions, but through effective leadership, commitment, ethical behaviour, and consistent action.
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal
Wednesday, October 14, 2026
World Standards Day – 14 October – Standards: The Foundation of Better Quality and a Safer Future
World Standards Day – 14 October – Standards: The Foundation of Better Quality and a Safer Future
**********
World Standards Day is celebrated every year on 14 October to raise awareness of the importance of international standards and highlight their role in ensuring the quality, safety, reliability, and efficiency of products, services, and management systems. World Standards Day is observed through the collaboration of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). It is also an occasion to recognize the valuable contributions of experts who participate in the development of international standards.
Standards are an integral part of our daily lives. They help improve the consistency of products and services, ensure technical compatibility, protect consumer interests, and facilitate international trade. Standards such as ISO 9001 for Quality Management Systems guide organizations in improving processes, enhancing customer satisfaction, and fostering a culture of continual improvement. In today's changing world, standards also play a significant role in addressing challenges such as climate change, digital transformation, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and sustainable development.
World Standards Day reminds us that standards are not merely a collection of rules and requirements; they are powerful tools for promoting quality, trust, innovation, and sustainable development. On this World Standards Day, let us recognize the importance of standards in our work and processes, commit ourselves to their effective implementation, and promote a culture of quality. Embrace Standards, Enhance Quality, and Build a Better Future.
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal
Joint Message from IEC President, ISO President and UTU Director on World Standards Day - Link Click Here
Wednesday, October 7, 2026
Failure of Quality Management System (QMS)
Failure of Quality Management System (QMS)
**********
Quality management system (QMS) doesn't fail t the shop-floor level, it fails due to weak leadership behaviour.
At the shop-floor level -
- Employees follow defined processes.
- They work with commitment.
- They identify and report problems.
- They strive to meet customer requirements.
- They contribute to continual improvement.
A strong QMS depends on strong leadership.
Weak leadership behaviour -
- Lack of commitment to quality.
- Does not provide clear direction and priorities.
- Does not allocate adequate resources.
- Does not review QMS performance.
- Does not support a culture of continual improvement.
- Talks about quality, but does not demonstrate it.
The shop-floor team usually does its best. A quality management system fails when leadership behaviour is weak, inconsistent or absent.
Leadership needs to -
- Have commitment to quality.
- Provide clear direction and priorities to shop-floor people.
- Allocate adequate resources.
- Review QMS performance from time to time.
- Support a culture of continual improvement.
- Demonstrate quality commitment.
Regards,
Keshav Ram Singhal









